I'm trying to initiate a CICS transaction from a JCL. I use the IPCPBTCH utility and the 'init KC' command. Can...
this be used?. The transaction by itself has to restart after reading 10 records. Now the problem is, it restarts only 3 or 4 times. I've used a "CICS START" command with TRANSID option. Is there any restrictions on this, namely restart can occur only twice or thrice?. When I use a "CICS Return" with a transid option the transaction executes fine in CICS terminal, but fails when initiated through the JCL.
Please help me with this case.
There is no CICS restriction about the number of times a transaction instance can restart itself - there is nothing to stop multiple instances of the same non-terminal transaction running concurrently.
If you only want to be able to initiate activity within CICS from JCL, have a look at one of my SupportPacs (via the CICS Web Site) that permits a program to be invoked within a CICS region from JCL (or even a MVS Pipe!)
Having written this utility (which uses EXCI to talk to CICS) I'd be a little surprised if you initiate a transaction via this vendor utility and then initiate another non-terminal background transaction and expect to get output back from this 2nd non-terminal transaction. No doubt there is some interesting code involved.
It also occurs to me that as the program you are invoking ends with XC RETURN TRANID(x) this is not the way to get the next transaction running when not at a terminal. This option only works for pseudo-conversational actiity at a terminal (real or Bridge emulated). You have got to get the next transaction in the sequence going via an XC START TRANID(x).
The other thing you should investigate, via Trace, is why you only get the 3/4 reinitiations. Is there some sort of Abend Code, or Exception Trace generated? Or does the initiation command succeed but the task itself never get going? Is there any interference due to TCLASS issues or MAXTASK effects? Any interesting messages around? Is the routing exit interfering this things?
Is there any good reason for limiting the transaction to processing 10 things? I'd be rather inclined to have a design which did one thing at a time or everything in one go.
Dig Deeper on IBM system z and mainframe systems
Related Q&A from Robert Crawford
For better mainframe capacity planning, how do I convert CPU hours to MIPS? And is there a way to calculate the relationship between MIPS and MSUs?continue reading
I have two years of experience in mainframe technology, currently working as a mainframe developer. I want to change to Java technology.continue reading
I want to replicate DB2 from the mainframe to an AIX box since it's cheaper and the copy can be used for testing. Is this possible?continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.