News Stay informed about the latest enterprise technology news and product updates.

Fortify IoT infrastructure now, even for simple deployments

The IoT deployments in the enterprise today may not tax the current infrastructure, but it's not too soon to prep for the demands of tomorrow.

IT pros in the data center are more likely to sing "Don't Worry, Be Happy" about their internet-of-things deployments so far -- but, soon, they may change their tune to "Highway to Hell."

Typical enterprise projects today that involve the internet of things (IoT) are relatively simple. IT departments, however, must consider the needs of future IoT applications and the needs of the supporting infrastructure to avoid an IoT calamity.

"Most of the real-world uses out there today aren't all that sexy," said Kuba Stolarski, a research director at IDC, speaking at the recent IDC Directions event in Boston, in a discussion about the data explosion expected to hit IT infrastructure from the IoT. It's all very simple, compared with what is expected to come, he said.

In many IoT applications, companies send IoT data back to their data center and largely rely on existing infrastructure and architecture. Some examples of IoT deployments from an IDC focus group of 10 IT managers include a utility company with devices attached to home oil tanks and a trucking company that uses GPS to calculate fuel economy.

"A lot of the current deployments really don't need that much bandwidth," Stolarski said.

Latency is not a concern for these IT pros, and they typically view data on dashboards, rather than use real-time analytics or decision-making at the edge, Stolarski said.

Kevin Roberts, director of platform technology at FinancialForce, a cloud-based software startup in San Francisco, is building out the financial back end to support a growing number of IoT deployments in the enterprise. Roberts said he's seen a turnaround in terms of the acceptance of cloud computing in recent years, which has shifted from mistrust of the cloud to widespread acceptance.

Right now, it's unclear what sort of backbone enterprises will use to support their IoT efforts, Roberts said. There will continue to be a shakeout to decide who will buy, own and manage IoT infrastructure.

Stolarski concurred. Some of this will be premises-based that is bought, owned and managed by enterprises, such as a retail store, while other IoT infrastructure may come in the form of shared gateways in public locations, he said.

The logic and approaches with which IT pros will choose and deploy hardware, and use cloud computing and their enterprise data centers, will continue to evolve, Stolarski said. The current IoT deployments may be manageable for now, but the number of external nodes generating data may overwhelm the network at some point.

"Don't just fire-hose your data back to your data center, because you will kill your bandwidth," he said. "They are totally not thinking about any scenario in the future."

Different paths to IoT life on the edge

While software continues to eat the world, Stolarski urged IT pros not to lose sight of the importance of hardware in an IoT project, especially out at the edge versus a centralized strategy. IoT sensors designed to detect a gas leak, for example, should immediately shut off the gas and not send data across a network to make that decision, Stolarski said.

[Enterprise IT teams] are totally not thinking about any scenario in the future.
Kuba Stolarskiresearch director, IDC

To that end, vendors increasingly look to support IoT outside traditional data centers. Some IoT gateways may be servers, Stolarski said, citing the Edgeline IoT System from Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) as one example.

At the other end of the scale are entire mini data centers, such as Schneider Electric's Micro Data Center Xpress product, launched this week. It combines power and cooling with monitoring software in an integrated and validated enclosure, with IT hardware from Dell EMC, HPE and Cisco. The goal is to ship an entire mini-standard data center to a ruggedized environment, rather than design and test a package in one place and ship all the pieces separately to a remote site.

The characteristics of how IoT infrastructure will appear in the enterprise are still emerging. But for a look at the next generation of enterprise IoT projects, start with oil and gas companies, where a wave of IoT innovation is underway, said Srdan Mutabdzija, senior project manager at Schneider Electric.

"[IoT infrastructure] is absolutely being clarified. It is where cloud was 10 years ago," he said.

Robert Gates covers data centers, data center strategies, server technologies, converged and hyper-converged infrastructure and open source operating systems for SearchDataCenter. Follow him on Twitter @RBGatesTT or email him at

Next Steps

Build an IoT architecture for your data center

Create an IoT and big data roadmap

Explore the effects of IoT on data center teams

Dig Deeper on Emerging IT workload types



Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

How prepared is your infrastructure to move beyond a basic internet of things deployment?
...supporting infrastructure to avoid an IoT calamity?
...explosion expected to hit IT infrastructure?

The real calamity and explosion to worry about is not mentioned in this article.

Most IoT security articles focus on managing software glitches, anti-virus and hacking.

What is not discussed is the complete vulnerability of the US power grid and the billions of unprotected interconnected solid state devices to a massive solar flare or a very likely hostile EMP attack.

Only a tiny fraction of the nations infrastructure is hardened enough to survive one, and it is NOT the US electrical grid.

Pass the SHIELD Act Now, Before It's Too Late

breitbart. com/national-security/2013/07/29/pass-the-shield-act-now-before-it-is-too-late/

On June 18, (2015) the Congressional EMP Caucus held a public event to launch the SHIELD Act, (H. R. 1073) which would protect the national electric grid from a natural or manmade electromagnetic pulse (EMP).

EMP is the ultimate cyber threat, a high-tech means of killing millions the old fashioned way–through starvation, disease, and societal collapse.

An EMP can be generated by a terrorist or rogue state nuclear missile, or even by lofting a warhead with a balloon, perhaps launched off a freighter near our shores to preserve anonymity, and burst at high-altitude. A single crude nuclear weapon could generate an EMP that would collapse electric grids and critical infrastructures everywhere in the United States.

A ship-launched EMP attack by terrorists or rogue states could conceal the identity of the attacker, so we might never know who hit us.

Iran, the world’s chief sponsor of international terrorism, openly writes about eliminating the United States with an EMP attack, has conducted live missile launches simulating EMP attacks, and has practiced missile launching from a vessel in the Caspian Sea. In December 2012, North Korea used an intercontinental missile to orbit a satellite that appeared to be a practice run for a surprise nuclear EMP attack that bypasses U.S. early warning radars and missile defenses.

An EMP can also be generated by the Sun, causing geomagnetic storms on Earth. In 1989, a geomagnetic storm blacked out eastern Canada, inflicting billions of dollars in losses. In 1859, the Carrington Event, a rare geomagnetic super-storm, caused worldwide damage and fires in telegraph stations and other primitive electronics–none of which were then necessary for societal survival.

H.R. 1073 Introduced: Feb 25, 2015
Status:Passed House on Nov 16, 2015
This bill passed in the House on November 16, 2015 and goes to the Senate next for consideration.
Prognosis Details
This bill has a 3% chance of being enacted. 

Why? Industry does not want to pay for it and Congress has been effectively bribed to ignore the threat.

Once again the corporate bottom line trumps national security.