| Type of Storage | Pros | Cons | General use |
| Direct-attached storage (DAS) | SimpleLow starting costEasy to use |
Needs separate storage for each serverNot easy to transfer data in networkServer takes application processing load | Data and application sharingData backupArchiving |
| Disk library | FastHigh storage capacityHigh data availability | Not as easily accessible as DASIntended for write once, read rarely info | Disk-to-disk backupArchivingNear line storage |
| Magnetic tape | Low cost per megabitePortableUnlimited capacity (with multiple tapes) | Inconvienient for fast recovery of individual or group files | ArchivingLimited-budget businessesOffsite storage |
| Network-attached storage (NAS) | Fast file access for multiple clientsEase of data sharingHigh storage capacityRedundancyEase of drive mirroringConsolidated resources | Less convienient than SAN for moving large blocks of data | BackupArchivingRedundant storage |
| Redundant array of independent disks (RAID) | FastHigh storage capacityHigh data availabilityReliableSecurityFault tolerance | Possible false sense of securitySome recovery difficulty on some systemsHigh cost for optimum systems | Swap filesInternet service providersRedundant storage |
| Storage area network (SAN) | Excellent for moving large blocks of dataExceptional reliabilityEasily availibleFault toleranceScalability | ExpensiveLack of standardizationManagement complexity | Large databasesBandwith-intensive applicationsMission-critical applications |