Sergey Nivens - Fotolia

Evaluate Weigh the pros and cons of technologies, products and projects you are considering.

Hyperconverged systems prove viable SAN alternative

Why are IT pros looking to hyperconverged offerings? The architecture and skills required for SANs are some reasons.

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download: Modern Infrastructure: Can hyperconverged systems transform the enterprise?:

Thinking about buying a new storage area network? With hyperconverged systems' increased popularity, you might want to reconsider.

Data center infrastructure mainly consists of standalone servers running virtualization and scale-up storage arrays connected over a network, usually Fibre Channel or iSCSI. But a new generation of hyperconverged infrastructure is challenging that model, creating virtual storage area networks (SANs) out of locally attached flash and hard disk drive storage.

Alternately dubbed virtual SAN, server SAN and SAN-free storage, this new approach is causing many IT professionals to rethink their assumptions about how to approach their on-premises infrastructure needs -- especially storage.

Today's hyperconverged systems range from software-only products targeted at small and medium-size businesses, enterprise-grade hardware appliances designed to take on mission-critical workloads, and everything in between. Players include early- and late-stage startups, tier-one server and storage OEMs, and name-brand enterprise software vendors.

And the market is booming. In 2014, analyst firm Wikibon predicted hyperconvergence sales of $487 million. Actual sales turned out to be in the $500 million to $600 million range -- virtually nothing compared with the overall enterprise storage systems market, which IDC put at $36.2 billion in 2014. But virtual SAN more than doubled last year. "And this year is when the big players are starting to get into it," said Stu Miniman, Wikibon senior analyst.

The early adopters

Virtual SAN adoption usually starts small, designed to improve IT capabilities at a remote location. Driscoll's, for example, a multi billion-dollar-a-year berry distributor based in Watsonville, Calif., has 50 distribution centers across North America, and the servers need to connect back to enterprise resource planning and supply chain systems running in the central data center. Having servers or storage fail at the distribution centers is not an option, said Soumitra Ghosh, vice president of infrastructure.

"In a lot of ways, our business is a lot harder than Amazon's because we're dealing with a perishable commodity," Ghosh said. "If we go down, that means we cannot ship the berries, and they have to be thrown away."

So all infrastructure at the remote site must be highly available even if there's no IT staff. To that end, Driscoll's upgraded the server and storage at its distribution centers last year. It considered pre-packaged hyperconverged appliances. Because it already had some servers, the team chose software from Maxta, running on a four-node cluster.

Ghosh is pleased with the performance and manageability of the Maxta stack, and the initial deployment may bear fruit back in the primary data center. "We have seen enough performance out of them that we would consider putting them in to our data center," he said, as the infrastructure behind the development environment.

Hyperconverged appliances also find a home in small IT environments that don't have the stomach for a full-fledged SAN. That's what the City of West Chicago found a couple of years ago when it tried VMware virtualization.

"We bought some servers, we bought a SAN, we bought the virtualization licenses," at about $60,000, recalled Peter Zaikowski, IT manager for the city, which virtualized six of its 25 servers. Everything worked fine, but then Zaikowski realized he needed to invest another $100,000 to virtualize the remaining systems. "We're a small city. Having to go back to the City Council and ask for that money wasn't something I wanted to do."

For one-fifth the cost, Zaikowski implemented a three-node cluster of hyperconverged appliances from Scale Computing. Later this year, when the VMware licenses run out, he'll migrate those VMs to the Scale cluster, and repurpose the SAN storage as a backup-to-disk target.

Even some SAN stalwarts choose the hyperconverged path. San Mateo County in California bought a Nutanix cluster for a virtual desktop infrastructure deployment, but has migrated over 500 VMs in its VMware farm to the environment, retiring a variety of server and SAN platforms along the way. "We really liked Fibre [Channel], but it's just a lot more work, a lot more management complexity," said Erik Larson, the storage and virtualization architect for the county. Making matters worse is that people with SAN skills are increasingly hard to come by.

"We just don't have that many people comfortable adding an HBA [host bust adopter] or zoning a LUN [logical unit number]," Larson said. When the project concludes, the only servers still connected to a SAN will be legacy applications running on Unix and IBM System i, he predicted.

The vendor mix

In the short term, the biggest problem potential hyperconverged customers are likely to face is determining from whom to buy. Most, if not all, top IT vendors have systems to compete with offerings from start-ups, many based on VMware's EVO:RAIL offering.

"We're on volley number two," said Arun Taneja, founder of the storage-centric analyst firm Taneja Group. "There are a lot of good products on the market, each with their own differentiator, and they all have a good shot at the market."

And while the hyperconvergence market is by no means mature, "We're not in the infant phase either -- more of a school child. You can start to see their strengths and personalities."

Storage, compute and DR too

Some hyperconvergence plays give more than just on-premises compute and storage capacity -- they double as backup and disaster recovery (DR) solutions too. A couple of years ago, The Neenan Co., a design and build construction company in Fort Collins, Colo., needed to upgrade its VMware ESX server farm and its aging Dell EqualLogic SAN. At the same time, George Dial, IT manager at the firm, knew that its DR posture wasn't great.

"If we suffered a loss, we could have a three- or four-day loss if things went wrong," he said.

Dial decided to solve all of those problems at once by purchasing a pair of SimpliVity OmniCubes for its office. It put another pair at a sister real-estate firm in Denver, and set the two clusters to replicate to one another.

Improved DR was the deciding factor. "I looked at buying new HP servers and another EqualLogic, and on paper it was actually less expensive, but [the system] wasn't very smart," Dial said. There was no deduplication of data, the performance was average, and it meant having to administer backups through a separate interface. In contrast, SimpliVity includes deduplication as a baseline feature, performance is great, and all administration -- even backup and DR -- happens through VMware vCenter.

"It was sort of a leap of faith," Dial said. But even though SimpliVity was a very new company at the time, the system has proved itself, and "everybody is over the moon."

Alex Barrett is editor in chief of Modern Infrastructure. Email her at abarrett@techtarget.com.

This was last published in June 2015

Dig Deeper on Converged infrastructure (CI)

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation

5 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Virtual SAN, Server SAN and SAN-free do not equal hyper-converged. They can still be stand-alone storage layer. In order to go HC you need additional pieces, besides the storage software, although it stays the backbone.
Cancel
agreed. It may not have started out that way, but I'm increasingly getting the feeling that "hyperconverged" is simply a marketing buzzword that vendors are jumping on without having a clear idea of what it means. 
Cancel
All the technology always change with a small Marketing Buzz word ( either cloud or HC), however by this way new thoughts came and technology improve. Now the HC technologies matured enough that's why so many vendor are entering in it to get business. It is less complex, less expensive and easily scalable solution compare to running so old SAN solution. It's adoption is fast because of so many benefits.
Cancel
I agree that there are distinctions between virtual SAN, server SAN and hyperconverged, and that I'm using 'hyperconverged' as sort of a catch-phrase for all three of those concepts. But the fact remains that the trend is putting serious pressure on the traditional server+SAN model.
Cancel
I agree that Hyperconverged infrastructure is the latest buzz word in storage and storage infrastructure. I also agree that some of the terms being thrown around are actually confusing the market instead of helping to better define some of the newer solutions out there. While the list of vendors exemplified here is diverse it is not comprehensive. Also, there are many pros and cons with all of them.

The most accurate statement present is that the traditional SAN model is changing. Will it ever go away completely? No. Just like when iSCSI and FCoE came around everyone said FC is dead. Well its still here kids! The one thing I have noticed about storage is there is always room for everyone. Personally I think trends will continue to change as we continue to look to optimize environments to provide a particular service offering. Hyperconverged infrastructure is just a new tool in the tool box that helps with a lot of different issues. Some of these issues are only now present as other technologies have matured. It will be interesting to see what happens next in this space. I think we will see more consolidation of storage vendors like the recent acquisition of EMC by Dell.
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchWindowsServer

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

Close