Access your Pro+ Content below.
How to optimize VM placement in data centers
This article is part of the April 2009, Vol. 9 issue of Virtual Data Center
Today, more organizations are moving server virtualization technologies into production. It makes sense, especially during these tough economic times, because server virtualization promises vast savings in server hardware, rack space, power consumption and cooling. But in order to move to server virtualization, many organizations have discovered that they must acquire new physical server technologies. That's because the latest hypervisors rely on x64 hardware with hardware-assisted virtualization baked into the server processor. In a way, this new hardware acquisition also makes sense because it comes with reduced power consumption and reduced cooling requirements, which supports the effort to reduce ongoing costs in data centers. The problem is that too many organizations are content with the default 10:1 ratio they obtain through physical server consolidation. Yet you can increase this ratio further and reduce the number of required host servers by focusing on the process of virtual machine (VM) placement on host servers. To ...
Access this PRO+ Content for Free!
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Features in this issue
Move from conservative to aggressive VM placement and reap the server consolidation benefits while maintaining performance.
On paper, Microsoft's Hyper-V costs less than VMware ESXi, but several gotchas drive up its overall cost.
Server virtualization is an obvious money-saver, but you still need to calculate return on investment. There are often hidden costs that will affect your virtualization ROI.