I'm trying get management to support making some CICS V4 temp storage tuning changes. To a couple of us these are...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
no-brainers, but where we're having difficulty is to be able to say what savings can we expect to see as the result of these tuning changes. Our non-production regions don't have enough activity to really get any figures to publish. Here's one example of a heavily used CICS V4 region........what we see today.......and what I plan to do:
Note I'm getting the stats from Omegamon CICS:
Please don't chuckle!
CIMACPR7 is the region.
4K CI for temp storage
PUTs > CI size . . . . : 125444
TSGID extensions = 53,477
Unit table compressions = 1,123,098
Total Q's created = 1,666,984
Items in Q (HWM) 29,487
Longest aux item = 32,787
Temp storage buffers/strings are 64,4
What I plan to do:
TSGID=100 (to start)
Temp storage CISIZE 8K to start then
evaluate (also increase the size of the temp storage dataset by 1/3).
Buffers/strings increase to 100,50 and evaluate.
Can you give me any ammunition?
Based on what I have read and seen in test regions, I am going to possibly decrease DSA utilization, increase thruput, and possibly decrease transaction response time for transactions that use temp storage (and possibly on other transactions too). Can I expect to see any cpu savings? Any negative impact to be expected? What do you think........If I make the changes as specified, I can't think of any.
Your opinion and recommendation is appreciated. We've got about 10 CICS V4 regions in this same condition and with similar volume, so I really feel we have an opportunity to effect some savings here.
I am afraid I cannot quantify what any gains might be. The only thing I can say is that the given the current Temporary Storage statistics, the proposed changes are in-line with tuning recommendations. I cannot really see that it would have any negative impact unless you are already severely storage constrained.
Dig Deeper on IBM system z and mainframe systems
Related Q&A from Robert Crawford
For better mainframe capacity planning, how do I convert CPU hours to MIPS? And is there a way to calculate the relationship between MIPS and MSUs?continue reading
I have two years of experience in mainframe technology, currently working as a mainframe developer. I want to change to Java technology.continue reading
I want to replicate DB2 from the mainframe to an AIX box since it's cheaper and the copy can be used for testing. Is this possible?continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.