I want to run CICS transaction server(TS) 1.3 and CICS 4.1 on the same LPAR. For compatibility, can I run with the TS 1.3 SDFHLPA in the LPALIST and the type 6 SVC in the Nucleus? Will this cause any problems with CICS 4.1? Is there a recommended way to run the two in the same LPAR? The SVCs can be migrated without any problems. If you want to use the same SVC numbers, then install the CTS 1.3 ones and IPL. The out-of-service 4.1 will...
happily run with these newer SVCs. If you don't want to risk using the CTS 1.3 SVCs in the 4.1 region, then just use different numbers for the CTS 1.3 SVCs.
However, you cannot share LPA resident modules in this fashion. One of the regions must use LPA=NO and the other run with LPA=YES in the MVS image. I'd suggest running your existing 4.1 regions with LPA=NO for a day or two to determine the performance impact. Then, if this is acceptable, use LPA=YES in the (newer) CTS 1.3 region as this is where you will get the best benefit. Otherwise, use LPA=NO in the CTS 1.3 region and then only go to LPA=YES (with an IPL!) when all the 4.1 regions have gone away.
CICS Technical Strategist -- CICS expert at Search390.com
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .VO7aaqqaAFk.0@/search390>discussion forums.
Dig deeper on Mainframe operating systems and management
Related Q&A from Robert Crawford
With 3270 bridge, you can't stack input messages into one structure. The bridge can't process them all at once. It takes a little more work.continue reading
CICS expert Robert Crawford offers advice on determining the connection between CICS transactions and MQ Queue name.continue reading
CICS expert Robert Crawford discusses if a program can use IXLLIST macros in CICS when IXLLIST are APF.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.