We are running CWS in CTS 2.2. In the TCPIPSERVICE definition we have defined SOCKETCLOSE(0). We will test persistent...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
connection ex SOCKETCLOSE(20). The manual CICS Internet Guide 2.2 says: "CICS supports only the HTTP 1.0 Keep-Alive implementation of the persistent connections, not the HTTP 1.1 implementation."
Whether you run HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 is depending on what's defined in the client. Standard for IE 5.5 or 6.0 is HTTP 1.1. One difference between HTTP 1.0 and 1.1 is that in 1.0 the server disconnects from the client after completing the request and in 1.1 the server by default keeps the connection open. Does this mean that the SOCKETCLOSE definition for HTTP 1.1 is of no use? Or have I misunderstood?
I'm sorry to say that for CTS 2.2 your understanding is correct. We only obey the HTTP 1.0 protocol. That is what should be negotiated from the browser as it looks like the browser is assuming HTTP 1.1 then the TCPIPSERVICE definition will have the effect you observe. Sorry.
CICS Technical Strategist -- CICS expert at Search390.com
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .VO7aaqqaAFk.0@/search390>discussion forums.
Dig Deeper on IBM system z and mainframe systems
Related Q&A from Robert Crawford
For better mainframe capacity planning, how do I convert CPU hours to MIPS? And is there a way to calculate the relationship between MIPS and MSUs?continue reading
I have two years of experience in mainframe technology, currently working as a mainframe developer. I want to change to Java technology.continue reading
I want to replicate DB2 from the mainframe to an AIX box since it's cheaper and the copy can be used for testing. Is this possible?continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.