Q

# How to figure size requirements for new UPS unit

## Find out how to decipher the size ratings for UPSes.

We need a new UPS, but we're confused by how to figure the size. Some ratings are in kW and kVA, others in only...

kVA or kW. Some have the same kW and kVA ratings, but for most the numbers are different. Then we have equipment rated in watts, VA or kVA, and some with just volts and amps -- often with a range of values. We don't want to over- or under-buy. What does it all mean?

The difference between watts (W) and volt-amperes (VA) confuses everyone, so don't feel alone. (kW and kVA simply mean 1,000 watts or 1,000 volt-amperes – the "kilo" prefix being used for larger numbers.) The basic rule of physics that "watts = volts x amps" is based on direct current (DC) circuits. Alternating current (AC), which supplies our buildings and equipment, is more efficient for the power company to deliver, but when it hits the transformers (coils of wire or inductors) inside most of our technology, it exhibits a characteristic known as reactance. Reactance reduces the useful power (watts) available from the apparent power (volt-amperes). The ratio of these two numbers is called the power factor (pf). Therefore, the actual power formula for AC circuits is "watts = volts x amps x power factor." Unfortunately, the power factor is rarely stated for most equipment, but it is always a number of 1.0 or less, and about the only thing with a 1.0 pf is a light bulb.

For years, large UPS Systems have been designed based on a pf of 0.8, which means that a 100 kVA UPS will only support 80 kW of "real" power load. Most UPSes continue to be designed that way, even though the majority of technology today has power factors of 0.95 – 0.98. (This is mainly because Europe won't allow anything with a pf less than 0.95 to be sold.) Neither the kW nor the kVA capacity of the UPS can be exceeded, but because of the higher pf numbers, it is usually the kW rating that governs today. There are, however, some UPSes on the market that are power factor corrected so that the kW and kVA ratings are the same.

The biggest problem is determining actual load, since many data hardware manufacturers still provide very inadequate or erroneous power data on their equipment. For the bigger manufacturers, investigate configurator web sites, which tend to give quite accurate information. But if you're forced to use the nameplate data on the devices, beware! This is a legality rating, and will usually give a much higher volt-ampere rating than the unit will ever draw. Consider a unit with a nameplate that reads 90 – 240 volts at 4 – 8 amps, and has a 500 watt power supply. First, the numbers are backwards. The larger amperage goes with the lower voltage. If you assume a nominal 120 volts at 8 amps, you get 960 VA. A pf of 0.95 would yield 912 watts. No power supply is that inefficient, and a power supply almost never runs at full power. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this device will ever draw more than 500 watts of power, but if you want to be really conservative, multiply by 1.1 and figure 550 watts of input power. And don't get trapped by dual-corded equipment. The power supplies share the load and either one is supposed to be able to carry the full load. Therefore, a unit with two 500 watt supplies should still be figured as if it had only one.

This was first published in January 2005

## Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

#### Have a question for an expert?

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Oldest

## SearchWindowsServer

• ### Ransomware protection is futile, but all hope is not lost

It's only a matter of time before a hacker infiltrates your system and holds your files hostage. But there are ways to blunt a ...

• ### The essential guide to Microsoft Windows Server 2016

Windows systems administrators can check out this guide to see what enhancements are coming in Microsoft Windows Server 2016.

• ### Determining the right time for a Windows Server 2016 upgrade

The release of Microsoft's latest server OS gives organizations a chance to rethink their IT infrastructure. Windows Server 2016 ...

## SearchEnterpriseLinux

• ### SUSE Linux jumps on the open private cloud deployment train

SUSE Linux Enterprise planning private cloud deployment with OpenStack weight behind it. NVIDIA works on Linux drivers for ...

• ### Want one of the many Linux jobs out there? Time to go back to class

Does extended education from the Linux Foundation and others help graduates meet the demands of today’s Linux jobs? Some say yes.

• ### Ubuntu ARM server AMI for Amazon EC2 offers fast access in the cloud

Canonical’s Ubuntu ARM server AMI for Amazon EC2 provide open source shops with a fast ARM server for the cloud.

## SearchServerVirtualization

• ### Amid hype, definition of hybrid cloud still elusive

While there are many competing definitions, most agree that a true hybrid cloud is more than just running workloads both on and ...

• ### As vSphere revenues dip, VMware heads for the (hybrid) cloud

With revenues from the product that put it atop of the virtualization heap under siege, VMware looks to its new offerings to ...

• ### Scripting the future: How to create an OpenStack VM with APIs

OpenStack supports a variety of application programming interface options for writing scripts. Learn how to create VMs through ...

## SearchCloudComputing

• ### How to effectively work with multiple cloud providers

Before working with multiple cloud providers, evaluate their services for compute, storage, security and more.

• ### Implementing a tiered storage architecture with hybrid cloud

By offering lower costs, higher performance and reduced data loss, hybrid cloud helps some organizations optimize their tiered ...

• ### The Best of Multiple Worlds

Working with multiple cloud providers is advantageous, though not necessarily easy. Making those different clouds work together ...

Close